|
reformidatio (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
but we are not contesting evolution. Creationism agrees with Darwinism, creationism is hand by hand with Darwinism. Creationists only defends the idea that the universe did not start by its own... Its impossible for something to simply appear from nowhere and explode into something. There must be intervention of intelligence to "press a button" and BAM, there goes the big bang, or maybe creating a universe without an explosion. And leaving it be... TO slowly evolute... Darwinism + Creationism.
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
many generations so as to better survived in a new environment.
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
When the theory of evolution arises, it assumes that when an organism gave birth to the next generation. Traits are inherited, and in addition to inherited traits, there must be room for the emergence of new traits not found in previous generation.
Genetic discovery of random mutation and genetic heredity indirectly proven in detail how these can occur. Correctly fulfilling a prediction of Evolution.
The observation he states showed Evolution in action, how organisms changed after
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i meant "he made" not "me make"
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Obviously u still have confusion between Evolution and Abiogenesis and Spontaneous Generation o.O
And i don't think Thomas Huxley has anything to do with Abiogenesis again.
Please, we are trying to help u understand the difference, please take a minute to ponder.
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So u disagree with him? U don't think me make sense? U think he contradicted the Bible in making a statement like that?
wildreams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Obviously, you have a poor understanding on thermodynamics and the implications it have in describing behaviour of a closed system vs an open system. And there is nothihg we can say to make u understand. U need to go back to school.
BMSRoyBasch (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How can it be all of the above? Natural Selection is observable. Mutations have been observed. Speciation has been observed. All of this is illogical? Our lowly origins from something simple to something more complicated. How is this arrogant? Observing evidence is ignorant? Evidence does exist, claiming that it doesn't won't make it go away.
ebola23410 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Archaeological research has found no evidence that the Sinai desert ever hosted, or could have hosted, millions of people, nor of a massive population increase in Canaan, estimated to have had a population of between 50,000 and 100,000, at the end of the march. The logistics involved also present problems: Eric Cline, points out that 2.5 million people marching ten abreast would form a line 150 miles long, without accounting for livestock.
ebola23410 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
taken literally the total number involved, the 600,000 "fighting men" plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude," would have been two million or more, equivalent to something between half and almost the entire Egyptian population of around 3-6 million. The loss of such a huge proportion of the population would have caused havoc to the Egyptian economy, yet no such effect has been discovered. |
