|
mdma4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
almost funny, but, nope, im a grown man and I work in the sciences every day lol. My field being biophysics, I happen to use particle accelerators frequently to obtain x-ray crystallographic data to infer the structure of the proteins I study
sirnicholson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
eww..nope i think i said you were young and will oneday understand.this will be my last reply to you.science is a wonderful thing.but when it comes to outerspace nasa has gotten ahead of itself.the pictures they show are misleading.they are reorganized pixaly pictures.maybe done so all people can understand what they are refering to.or maybe done to excite investers for more grants.its not a conspiracy theory but a observation of many years of viewing images from nasa
mdma4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
mm, nope, don't understand you .. don't think I ever will, you don't make any sense at all, in any of your posts, in any of your threads lol. You call everyone else a child, but I seriously wonder if its you whose the kid
sirnicholson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
if i say todo something i dont mean do it yesturday or ten minutes ago if it is a second later then it is in the future.i think your starting to understand.hang in there
mdma4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You never said anything about the future, you said:
"shrink it mount a mother ship on top and move it into outerspace.think about it."
and I don't have a crystal ball, I cannot see into the future, as it stands, there is no method of better propulsion, and no evidence there will be .. IF such discoveries are made, then so to will our future, as it stands though our only method of entering space is through chemical propulsion
sirnicholson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so yes it is possible in the future just like i said.thank you
mdma4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
*sigh*
This is what I said, I quote:
"We can't consider such experiments until we have a better method of reaching space (eg. a space elevator)"
Do you understand what I said? I said we can't consider such a project (now) UNTIL (aka IN THE FUTURE) we have a better method of reaching space (aka AGAIN IN THE FUTURE WHEN WE HAVE A BETTER METHOD OF REACHING SPACE !!)
sirnicholson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and no we cant consider such a thing.or did you mean yes it is possible in the future
mdma4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You are obsessed with accusing anyone who doesn't agree with you of being a child/teenager aren't you? I havn't been in a university class in years bud.
And no, we can't consider such a thing until we develop better/cheaper methods of propulsion.
It has cost billions, taken years, and taken many many flights to carry the respective components of the international space station into space, and its TINY compared to a 27km superconducting ring which has a mass of hundreds of thousands of tones
sirnicholson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so then you do think its possible."we cant consider such a thing"until" we have....qouting your last sentence.its not like you and i agree.lets just call it a freek accident.dont you have some studying todo? |
